United States vs Vatican City
Crypto regulation comparison
United States
Vatican City
The United States has the world's most complex crypto regulatory landscape, with overlapping federal and state jurisdictions. The SEC regulates crypto securities and has pursued enforcement actions against exchanges and token issuers. The CFTC oversees crypto derivatives and considers Bitcoin a commodity. FinCEN applies BSA requirements to crypto exchanges as money service businesses. The IRS taxes crypto as property: short-term gains at income tax rates (10-37%), long-term gains at 0-20%. New 1099-DA broker reporting rules take effect from 2025. Multiple states have their own requirements, with New York's BitLicense being the most stringent.
Vatican City has no cryptocurrency regulation. The micro-state's financial system is focused on the Holy See's financial activities. ASIF provides financial oversight.
Key Points
- SEC regulates crypto as securities under Howey test; major enforcement actions (Ripple, Coinbase, Binance)
- CFTC classifies Bitcoin and Ether as commodities; oversees derivatives markets
- IRS treats crypto as property: short-term gains taxed at 10-37%, long-term (1yr+) at 0-20%
- FinCEN requires exchanges to register as MSBs and comply with BSA/AML requirements
- 1099-DA broker reporting for centralized exchanges effective from tax year 2025
Key Points
- No specific cryptocurrency legislation
- ASIF provides financial oversight for the Holy See
- Micro-state with very limited financial market
- No crypto exchanges or services
- AML/CFT framework aligned with international standards
Sources
- IRS - Digital Assets
- CFTC - Digital Assets
- SEC - Crypto Task Force
- Congress - GENIUS Act (S.1582)
- FinCEN - Mining Ruling (FIN-2014-R001)
- IRS - FAQ on Digital Asset Transactions
- IRS - Capital Gains and Losses Topic 409
- FinCEN - Virtual Currency Guidance (FIN-2013-G001)
- IRS - Digital Asset Reporting and Tax Requirements