BTC $67,964.00 (+0.74%)
ETH $1,973.71 (+1.36%)
XRP $1.44 (+2.34%)
BNB $629.12 (+3.35%)
SOL $85.20 (+1.74%)
TRX $0.29 (+0.43%)
DOGE $0.10 (+1.38%)
BCH $567.19 (+2.58%)
ADA $0.28 (+2.21%)
LEO $8.64 (-0.65%)
HYPE $30.12 (+2.46%)
LINK $8.94 (+3.57%)
CC $0.16 (+1.43%)
XMR $326.87 (-1.31%)
XLM $0.16 (+0.99%)
RAIN $0.01 (-1.28%)
ZEC $261.94 (+1.65%)
HBAR $0.10 (+1.68%)
LTC $55.05 (+2.70%)
AVAX $9.26 (+1.69%)

China vs Guatemala

Crypto regulation comparison

China

China

Guatemala

Guatemala

Banned
No Regulation

China has imposed a comprehensive ban on cryptocurrency activities. In September 2021, the PBOC and ten other agencies jointly declared all cryptocurrency transactions illegal, and the State Council banned crypto mining. China is instead promoting the digital yuan (e-CNY) CBDC.

Guatemala has no specific cryptocurrency regulation. The Banco de Guatemala has stated that crypto is not legal tender and not backed by the central bank, but has not banned its use. Crypto usage exists primarily for remittances from the US-based diaspora.

Tax Type Unclear
Tax Type Unclear
Tax Rate N/A
Tax Rate N/A
Exchanges No No
Exchanges Yes Yes
Mining No No
Mining Yes Yes
Regulator PBOC (People's Bank of China), CBIRC, CSRC
Regulator Banguat (Banco de Guatemala), SIB
Stablecoin Rules Not applicable; all crypto activities are banned
Stablecoin Rules No stablecoin-specific regulation
Key Points
  • All crypto transactions declared illegal by PBOC and 10 agencies in September 2021
  • Crypto mining banned by the State Council in 2021 after a series of provincial crackdowns
  • Financial institutions and payment companies prohibited from facilitating crypto services
  • China actively developing and piloting the digital yuan (e-CNY) CBDC
  • Despite the ban, some Chinese citizens reportedly access crypto via VPNs and OTC desks
Key Points
  • No specific cryptocurrency legislation exists
  • Banguat has warned that crypto is not legal tender and not government-backed
  • Crypto is neither explicitly legal nor illegal for private use
  • Remittance use case is significant given large diaspora in the US
  • Tax treatment of crypto gains is unclear