Netherlands vs Papua New Guinea
Crypto regulation comparison
Netherlands
Papua New Guinea
Legal
No Regulation
The Netherlands has one of Europe's strictest crypto regulatory regimes. DNB has overseen VASP registration since 2020 under the Dutch AML/CFT Act (Wwft), and many applications have been rejected. The Netherlands does not tax realized capital gains directly; instead, crypto holdings are taxed under the Box 3 wealth tax based on a deemed return on net assets. The AFM oversees market conduct. MiCA is now the governing framework.
Papua New Guinea has no specific cryptocurrency regulation. The central bank has not issued formal guidance on crypto.
Tax Type
Wealth
Tax Type
None
Tax Rate
~1.2-1.6% (deemed return)
Tax Rate
N/A
Exchanges
Yes
Exchanges
Yes
Mining
Yes
Mining
Yes
Regulator
DNB (De Nederlandsche Bank), AFM (Autoriteit Financiële Markten)
Regulator
Bank of Papua New Guinea
Stablecoin Rules
Regulated under EU MiCA framework; DNB oversight
Stablecoin Rules
No stablecoin regulation
Key Points
- DNB requires VASP registration under the Wwft (AML Act); rigorous approval process
- Only a limited number of VASPs have obtained DNB registration (many rejected or withdrawn)
- Crypto taxed under Box 3 wealth tax: deemed return on net assets taxed at ~31-36% (effective ~1.2-1.6%)
- AFM regulates crypto advertising and market conduct; banned crypto ads targeting retail in 2022
- MiCA framework applicable from December 2024, transitioning from national DNB regime
Key Points
- No specific cryptocurrency legislation
- Central bank has not issued formal crypto guidance
- Limited internet and financial infrastructure
- Minimal crypto adoption
- No licensing framework for crypto services