BTC $67,045.00 (+1.70%)
ETH $1,941.18 (+0.80%)
XRP $1.40 (+0.01%)
BNB $607.52 (+1.22%)
SOL $82.57 (+2.90%)
TRX $0.29 (+2.03%)
DOGE $0.10 (+0.23%)
BCH $543.24 (+0.54%)
ADA $0.27 (+1.69%)
LEO $8.71 (+0.40%)
HYPE $28.76 (+2.36%)
XMR $330.17 (+0.08%)
LINK $8.55 (+1.56%)
CC $0.16 (-1.60%)
XLM $0.16 (+0.77%)
RAIN $0.01 (-1.31%)
ZEC $256.15 (-0.35%)
HBAR $0.10 (+1.12%)
LTC $53.50 (+3.25%)
AVAX $9.01 (+3.33%)

Ethiopia vs Guatemala

Crypto regulation comparison

Ethiopia

Ethiopia

Guatemala

Guatemala

Restricted
No Regulation

Ethiopia's Proclamation No. 1359/2024 explicitly prohibits cryptocurrency for payment transactions but allows the NBE to issue future guidelines on digital assets. Crypto mining is legal and actively growing, with Ethiopia emerging as a major Bitcoin mining destination leveraging hydroelectric power. A comprehensive regulatory framework is under development.

Guatemala has no specific cryptocurrency regulation. The Banco de Guatemala has stated that crypto is not legal tender and not backed by the central bank, but has not banned its use. Crypto usage exists primarily for remittances from the US-based diaspora.

Tax Type None
Tax Type Unclear
Tax Rate N/A
Tax Rate N/A
Exchanges No No
Exchanges Yes Yes
Mining Yes Yes
Mining Yes Yes
Regulator National Bank of Ethiopia
Regulator Banguat (Banco de Guatemala), SIB
Stablecoin Rules No stablecoin regulation
Stablecoin Rules No stablecoin-specific regulation
Key Points
  • Proclamation No. 1359/2024 prohibits cryptocurrency for payment transactions
  • NBE authorized to issue future directives on crypto assets and CBDCs
  • Crypto mining is legal and rapidly expanding, leveraging hydroelectric power
  • Ethiopia has become one of the fastest-growing Bitcoin mining destinations globally
  • Comprehensive digital asset regulatory framework under development
Key Points
  • No specific cryptocurrency legislation exists
  • Banguat has warned that crypto is not legal tender and not government-backed
  • Crypto is neither explicitly legal nor illegal for private use
  • Remittance use case is significant given large diaspora in the US
  • Tax treatment of crypto gains is unclear