BTC $68,213.00 (+3.45%)
ETH $2,054.44 (+6.86%)
XRP $1.43 (+3.57%)
BNB $627.62 (+4.81%)
SOL $88.13 (+7.20%)
TRX $0.29 (-0.10%)
DOGE $0.10 (+7.13%)
ADA $0.30 (+10.05%)
BCH $497.47 (-0.46%)
LEO $8.78 (+1.31%)
HYPE $27.98 (+1.61%)
CC $0.17 (+7.77%)
LINK $9.23 (+7.31%)
XMR $344.70 (+3.93%)
XLM $0.16 (+5.72%)
RAIN $0.01 (+0.11%)
HBAR $0.10 (+3.42%)
LTC $56.43 (+6.88%)
ZEC $249.73 (+1.25%)
AVAX $9.48 (+9.57%)

Ecuador vs Iraq

Crypto regulation comparison

Ecuador

Ecuador

Iraq

Iraq

Partially Regulated
Banned

Ecuador has a complex relationship with cryptocurrency. A 2014 National Assembly resolution banned Bitcoin as legal tender, and the Central Bank prohibits financial institutions from dealing in crypto. However, private ownership and trading of crypto are not explicitly illegal, and peer-to-peer usage exists.

Iraq has banned cryptocurrency dealings. The Central Bank of Iraq issued a directive in 2017 prohibiting banks, financial institutions, and exchange companies from dealing in cryptocurrency. Despite the ban, some underground and peer-to-peer crypto trading reportedly persists.

Tax Type Unclear
Tax Type Unclear
Tax Rate N/A
Tax Rate N/A
Exchanges Yes Yes
Exchanges No No
Mining Yes Yes
Mining No No
Regulator Banco Central del Ecuador, Superintendencia de Bancos
Regulator CBI (Central Bank of Iraq)
Stablecoin Rules No specific stablecoin regulation
Stablecoin Rules Not applicable; crypto activities prohibited
Key Points
  • 2014 resolution prohibits crypto from being used as legal tender
  • Central Bank bans financial institutions from facilitating crypto transactions
  • Private ownership and P2P trading exist in a legal gray area
  • Ecuador uses the US dollar as its official currency, limiting monetary policy tools
  • No comprehensive crypto regulatory framework in place
Key Points
  • CBI banned all crypto dealings by financial institutions in 2017
  • Exchange companies are prohibited from handling cryptocurrency
  • No regulatory framework for crypto businesses
  • Underground and P2P crypto trading reportedly exists despite the ban
  • The ban is motivated by AML concerns and financial stability considerations