Vavada Banner
BTC $71,631.00 (+4.74%)
ETH $2,251.67 (+7.62%)
XRP $1.38 (+5.64%)
BNB $612.76 (+2.61%)
SOL $84.64 (+6.98%)
TRX $0.32 (+0.94%)
DOGE $0.09 (+4.42%)
ADA $0.26 (+6.74%)
HYPE $39.33 (+8.30%)
LEO $10.11 (+0.04%)
BCH $445.99 (+3.35%)
LINK $9.21 (+5.99%)
XMR $342.20 (+3.54%)
ZEC $332.97 (+26.14%)
CC $0.14 (-3.00%)
XLM $0.16 (+5.04%)
M $2.62 (-5.37%)
LTC $55.08 (+3.70%)
AVAX $9.35 (+8.62%)
HBAR $0.09 (+6.64%)

Dominican Republic vs Iraq

Crypto regulation comparison

Dominican Republic

Dominican Republic

Iraq

Iraq

Restricted
Banned

The Dominican Republic has no specific cryptocurrency legislation. The central bank (BCRD) issued statements in 2017 and 2021 warning that crypto is not legal tender and prohibiting regulated financial institutions from dealing in digital assets under Monetary Law No. 183-02. Individual use is not criminalized but operates in a restricted gray area.

Iraq has banned cryptocurrency dealings. The Central Bank of Iraq issued a directive in 2017 prohibiting banks, financial institutions, and exchange companies from dealing in cryptocurrency. Despite the ban, some underground and peer-to-peer crypto trading reportedly persists.

Tax Type Unclear
Tax Type Unclear
Tax Rate N/A
Tax Rate N/A
Exchanges No No
Exchanges No No
Mining Yes Yes
Mining No No
Regulator Banco Central de la República Dominicana (BCRD), SIMV
Regulator CBI (Central Bank of Iraq)
Stablecoin Rules No stablecoin regulation
Stablecoin Rules Not applicable; crypto activities prohibited
Key Points
  • No specific cryptocurrency legislation exists
  • BCRD prohibits regulated financial institutions from dealing in crypto
  • Crypto is not recognized as legal tender
  • No licensing framework for crypto exchanges
  • Crypto gains treated as taxable income when converted to Dominican pesos
Key Points
  • CBI banned all crypto dealings by financial institutions in 2017
  • Exchange companies are prohibited from handling cryptocurrency
  • No regulatory framework for crypto businesses
  • Underground and P2P crypto trading reportedly exists despite the ban
  • The ban is motivated by AML concerns and financial stability considerations