BTC $67,134.00 (+0.96%)
ETH $1,956.48 (+1.75%)
XRP $1.42 (+1.31%)
BNB $618.96 (+2.98%)
SOL $83.76 (+3.61%)
TRX $0.29 (+1.12%)
DOGE $0.10 (+3.05%)
BCH $560.09 (+1.05%)
ADA $0.28 (+4.66%)
LEO $8.69 (+0.03%)
HYPE $29.76 (+4.46%)
LINK $8.77 (+3.57%)
CC $0.16 (+3.17%)
XMR $331.92 (+0.63%)
XLM $0.16 (+1.93%)
RAIN $0.01 (-2.52%)
ZEC $257.49 (-0.22%)
HBAR $0.10 (+1.86%)
LTC $54.75 (+5.05%)
AVAX $9.07 (+2.67%)

Czech Republic vs Guatemala

Crypto regulation comparison

Czech Republic

Czech Republic

Guatemala

Guatemala

Legal
No Regulation

Cryptocurrency is legal in the Czech Republic with a growing regulatory framework aligned with EU standards. Crypto gains are subject to personal income tax at 15% (or 23% for high earners). A 2024 amendment introduced a tax exemption for crypto held over 3 years, effective from 2025.

Guatemala has no specific cryptocurrency regulation. The Banco de Guatemala has stated that crypto is not legal tender and not backed by the central bank, but has not banned its use. Crypto usage exists primarily for remittances from the US-based diaspora.

Tax Type Capital gains
Tax Type Unclear
Tax Rate 15-23%
Tax Rate N/A
Exchanges Yes Yes
Exchanges Yes Yes
Mining Yes Yes
Mining Yes Yes
Regulator CNB (Czech National Bank), FAU (Financial Analytical Office)
Regulator Banguat (Banco de Guatemala), SIB
Stablecoin Rules Regulated under EU MiCA framework
Stablecoin Rules No stablecoin-specific regulation
Key Points
  • Crypto gains taxed at 15% income tax (23% for income above CZK 1,935,552)
  • New exemption from 2025: crypto held over 3 years or gains under CZK 100,000 per year exempt
  • VASPs must register with the FAU (trade licensing office) and comply with AML law
  • MiCA framework applicable from December 2024
  • Prague is a notable European hub for crypto businesses and blockchain development
Key Points
  • No specific cryptocurrency legislation exists
  • Banguat has warned that crypto is not legal tender and not government-backed
  • Crypto is neither explicitly legal nor illegal for private use
  • Remittance use case is significant given large diaspora in the US
  • Tax treatment of crypto gains is unclear