Cuba vs Georgia
Crypto regulation comparison
Cuba
Georgia
Cuba's Central Bank issued Resolution 215/2021 recognizing virtual assets and establishing a licensing framework for virtual asset service providers (VASPs). The BCC evaluates and grants one-year licenses to VASPs. US sanctions limit access to international platforms but domestic crypto use is formally regulated.
Georgia is one of the most crypto-friendly countries globally. There is no capital gains tax for individuals on cryptocurrency, and the country has a significant crypto mining industry due to low electricity costs. The National Bank has taken a cautious but permissive approach, issuing guidance rather than strict regulation.
Key Points
- Resolution 215 (2021) allows central bank to license virtual asset service providers
- Central Bank licenses virtual asset service providers under Resolution 215
- VASPs must comply with AML/KYC requirements and report to the central bank
- US sanctions significantly limit access to international crypto platforms
- Government agencies may not use virtual assets without BCC authorization
Key Points
- No capital gains tax on crypto for individuals
- Businesses dealing in crypto are taxed under standard corporate tax rules (15% CIT)
- Georgia is a major crypto mining hub due to cheap hydroelectric power
- NBG does not recognize crypto as legal tender but has not prohibited it
- The Free Industrial Zone offers additional tax advantages for crypto businesses