BTC $68,342.00 (+0.95%)
ETH $1,978.68 (+0.46%)
XRP $1.44 (+1.45%)
BNB $625.71 (-0.37%)
SOL $85.62 (+1.43%)
TRX $0.29 (+1.23%)
DOGE $0.10 (-1.48%)
BCH $564.27 (+0.72%)
ADA $0.28 (-1.16%)
LEO $8.32 (-4.31%)
HYPE $29.68 (-1.21%)
LINK $8.89 (-0.13%)
CC $0.16 (-3.30%)
XMR $327.43 (-1.57%)
XLM $0.16 (+0.28%)
RAIN $0.01 (-1.45%)
ZEC $259.89 (+0.44%)
HBAR $0.10 (+0.18%)
LTC $55.08 (-0.01%)
AVAX $9.19 (+0.78%)

Chile vs Iraq

Crypto regulation comparison

Chile

Chile

Iraq

Iraq

Legal
Banned

Chile passed a Fintech Law (Ley 21,521) in January 2023, establishing a regulatory framework for crypto service providers. The CMF is developing implementing regulations for virtual asset platforms. Crypto gains are taxed under general income tax rules.

Iraq has banned cryptocurrency dealings. The Central Bank of Iraq issued a directive in 2017 prohibiting banks, financial institutions, and exchange companies from dealing in cryptocurrency. Despite the ban, some underground and peer-to-peer crypto trading reportedly persists.

Tax Type Capital gains
Tax Type Unclear
Tax Rate 0-40%
Tax Rate N/A
Exchanges Yes Yes
Exchanges No No
Mining Yes Yes
Mining No No
Regulator CMF (Comisión para el Mercado Financiero)
Regulator CBI (Central Bank of Iraq)
Stablecoin Rules To be addressed under the Fintech Law implementing regulations
Stablecoin Rules Not applicable; crypto activities prohibited
Key Points
  • Fintech Law (Ley 21,521) passed in January 2023 covers crypto service providers
  • CMF designated as regulator for crypto platforms under the new law
  • Crypto exchanges must register and comply with AML/KYC requirements
  • Capital gains on crypto taxed under general income tax at progressive rates up to 40%
  • Chile has an active crypto market with exchanges like Buda.com operating since 2015
Key Points
  • CBI banned all crypto dealings by financial institutions in 2017
  • Exchange companies are prohibited from handling cryptocurrency
  • No regulatory framework for crypto businesses
  • Underground and P2P crypto trading reportedly exists despite the ban
  • The ban is motivated by AML concerns and financial stability considerations