BTC $64,927.00 (-3.78%)
ETH $1,866.78 (-4.11%)
XRP $1.36 (-1.81%)
BNB $596.88 (-2.79%)
SOL $78.73 (-5.58%)
TRX $0.28 (-3.37%)
DOGE $0.09 (-2.20%)
BCH $501.92 (-11.94%)
ADA $0.26 (-2.34%)
LEO $8.19 (-0.14%)
HYPE $26.51 (-8.39%)
CC $0.16 (+1.23%)
LINK $8.32 (-3.83%)
XMR $309.36 (-5.23%)
XLM $0.15 (-1.53%)
RAIN $0.01 (-2.58%)
HBAR $0.10 (-1.61%)
LTC $51.80 (-2.89%)
ZEC $240.00 (-2.06%)
AVAX $8.42 (-4.55%)

Cuba vs Iraq

Crypto regulation comparison

Cuba

Cuba

Iraq

Iraq

Legal
Banned

Cuba's Central Bank issued Resolution 215/2021 recognizing virtual assets and establishing a licensing framework for virtual asset service providers (VASPs). The BCC evaluates and grants one-year licenses to VASPs. US sanctions limit access to international platforms but domestic crypto use is formally regulated.

Iraq has banned cryptocurrency dealings. The Central Bank of Iraq issued a directive in 2017 prohibiting banks, financial institutions, and exchange companies from dealing in cryptocurrency. Despite the ban, some underground and peer-to-peer crypto trading reportedly persists.

Tax Type Unclear
Tax Type Unclear
Tax Rate N/A
Tax Rate N/A
Exchanges Yes Yes
Exchanges No No
Mining No No
Mining No No
Regulator Banco Central de Cuba (BCC)
Regulator CBI (Central Bank of Iraq)
Stablecoin Rules No stablecoin regulation
Stablecoin Rules Not applicable; crypto activities prohibited
Key Points
  • Resolution 215 (2021) allows central bank to license virtual asset service providers
  • Central Bank licenses virtual asset service providers under Resolution 215
  • VASPs must comply with AML/KYC requirements and report to the central bank
  • US sanctions significantly limit access to international crypto platforms
  • Government agencies may not use virtual assets without BCC authorization
Key Points
  • CBI banned all crypto dealings by financial institutions in 2017
  • Exchange companies are prohibited from handling cryptocurrency
  • No regulatory framework for crypto businesses
  • Underground and P2P crypto trading reportedly exists despite the ban
  • The ban is motivated by AML concerns and financial stability considerations